Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48591 (AP)

G.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY v. THE DISTRICT EDUACTION OFFICER

WP/22031/2002 · 2025-09-24

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010102802002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22031/2002 Between: 1. G.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O SUBBAREDDY SECONDARY GRADE ASSISTANT, RAVEENDRANATHA ELA., SCHOOL, PULIVENDALA, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 2. K.V. CHALAMA REDDY, S/O VENKATARAM REDDY SECONDARY GRADE ASST., RAVEENDRANATHA ELE. SCHOOL, PULIVENDALA, CUDDPAH DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DISTRICT EDUACTION OFFICER, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. 2. REVEENDRANATHA ELEMENTAR SCHOOL, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI U. NARAYANA REDDY, PULIVENDALA, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying pay scales as provided under 1993 and 1998 P.R.C. in the post of Secondary Grade Assistants to the petitioners without there being any valid reason as highly arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially to direct the respondents to release and pay all the arrears of salaried with interest at the rate of 18% Per annum and also to direct the respondents to continue to pay the payscales as privided under 1993 and 1998 P.R.C. and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 27604 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction directing the respondents to release and pay the payscales as provided under 1993 and 1998 to the petitioners forthwith pending disposal of the above W.P., and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P V RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22031/2002 ORDER: Ms.M.S.V.S.Sudha Rani, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25th September, 2025 RKS