Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48588 (ALL)

SMT SAROJ AND 4 OTHERS v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/11507/2024 · 2025-08-19

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:142798 Court No. - 89 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11507 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt Saroj And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kunal Kumar,Uma Dutt Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prabhat Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicants, is taken on record. 2. The case is taken up on mentioning. 3. Heard Sri Uma Dutt Shukla, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Prabhat Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri Uma Shankar Mishra, learned AGA for the State-opposite party no.1. 4. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred with prayer to quash the charge sheet No. 51 of 2023 dated 12.02.2023 and its cognizance order dated 17.11.2023 as well as entire proceeding of Case No.33426 of 2023 (State Vs. Dinesh and others), arising out of Case Crime No.51 of 2023, under sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 324, 325, IPC, Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Agra, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromise and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record. He further submits that certified copy of the proceeding of compromise verification is also on record and annexed as annexure no.S.A.-2 to the supplementary affidavit. Learned counsel for the applicants further prays that in view of the compromise entered into between the applicants and opposite party no.2, the proceeding of the aforesaid case be quashed. 6. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State have no objection to the above submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants. 7. In view of the fact that applicants and opposite party no.2 have entered into compromised and the said compromise has already been verified by the learned court concerned and a report regarding verification of compromise sent by the court concerned is already on the record and taking note of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed, in respect of the applicants. 8. In view of the aforesaid, the charge sheet No. 51 of 2023 dated 12.02.2023 and its cognizance order dated 17.11.2023 as well as entire proceeding of Case No.33426 of 2023 (State Vs. Dinesh and others), arising out of Case Crime No.51 of 2023, under sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 324, 325, IPC, Police Station Sadar Bazar, District Agra, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, are hereby quashed. 9. The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is hereby allowed. Order Date :- 20.8.2025 VKG Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad