Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48584 (AP)

Dr. Ambedkar Memorial ITI v. The Union of India, Rep. by Principal Secretary (Labour)

WP/36804/2014 · 2025-09-22

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010599012014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36804/2014 Between: 1. DR. AMBEDKAR MEMORIAL ITI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY & CORRESPONDENT SRI K.KONDALA RAO S/O VENKATA RAJU AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RIO DABA GARDENS MAIN ROAD VIZIANAGARAM-530001, A.P. 2. SRI UMA BHARATHI, ITIA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SRI DAMODARA APPALA GAURI KRISHNAM RAJU S/O SATYAM, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RAILWAY STATIN ROAD, SRUNGAVARUPUKOTA VIZIANAGARAM-505145, A.P. 3. VISWA BHARATHI, ITIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY & CORRESPONDENT SRI G. KONDALA RAO SIC) VENKATA RAJU AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, K. KOTAPADU ROAD, KOTHAVALSA POST & MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. 4. BRAMARAMBA, ITI REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT 4. BRAMARAMBA, ITI, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI G. KONDALA RAO S/O VENKATA RAJU AGEDA BOUT 65 YEARS NEW BRAHAM SAI TEMPLE RAYAGADA ROAD, PARVATHIPURAM VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. 5. BHAVAN, ITI, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI REDDI VENKANNA S/O SIMHADRI APPADU AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, VISAKHA ROAD, SRUNGAVARUPUKOTA VIZIANAGARAM, A.P. 6. SIVA ITIA, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SRI S.D. NAIDU S/O MARIDAYYA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS GAVARAPALEM NEW NOOKAMBHA TEMPLE OPP. KALYANAMANDAPAMM ANKAPALLI- 2 JS,J W.P.No.36804/2014 531002, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P. 7. SURYA ITI, REP. BY ITS CORRESPONDENT SRI A. SRIKANTH S/O APPALA NAIDU AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS MAIN ROAD, JAMI VILLAGE & MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. 8. SMT. SAROJINI ITI, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SRI T.SRINIVASA RAO S/O NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS GARIVIDI (V & M), VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 9. BALAJEE ITI, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SRI R. CHANDRASEKHAR S/O NARAYANA RAO AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, GAJAPATHINAGARAM (V & M) VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. 10. P.S.N.ITI, REP. BY ITS CORRESPODNENT SRI P. HARI PRASADA RAO S/O SIMHADRI NAIDU AGEDA BOUT 52 YEARS VENGAPURAM (VILLAGE), BALIJIPETA MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM - 535557, A.P. 11. S.V.R.M.ITI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY SRI N.V.G.SRINIVAS S/O BALAKISHNA RAO AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS PERAVALI (POST & MANDAL) WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 12. SRI PHYDI ITI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY SRI A. SRINIVASA RAO S/O RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS TALLAPUDI POST AND MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. 13. JAGADEESWARI ITI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY & CORRESOPNDENT SRI CHAPPIDI ARJUNA RAO S/O CHITTIYYA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS MAIN ROAD, MALKIPURAM EAST GODAVARI DSITRICT-533253, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY LABOUR, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SHRAMSHAKTHI BHAVAN RAFIQ MARG, NEW DELHI. 3 JS,J W.P.No.36804/2014 3. THE COMMISSIONER, EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH B.R.K.R.BHAVAN, TANK BUND HYDERABAD. 4. THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR VOCATIONIAL TRAINING NCVT, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL TRAINING, MINISTRY OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI. 5. THE QUALITY COUNCIL OF INDIA, INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS BUILDING 2ND FLOOR, 2ND BAHADUR SHAH JAFFAR MARG NEW DELHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of a WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents a) requiring the petitioners to obtain re-affiliation through the private agency i.e., Quality Council of India is arbitrary and illegal. b) to declare that the petitioners are entitled to continue to run their institutes without requirement of re-affiliation on the basis of the affiliation which was already granted to them, c) to declare that the action of the respondents in constituting and appointing a private agency namely Quality Council of India for the purpose of carrying out the work of accreditation, is arbitrary and illegal and consequently directed the respondents not to interfere with the conduct of Private Industrial Training institutes by the petitioners on the basis of the affiliation which already been granted and grant such other relief as it deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 46064 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioners to admit students for the sessions 2015-2016 onwards without requirement of re-affiliation, pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 46065 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to insist upon the petitioners to apply for re- 4 JS,J W.P.No.36804/2014 affiliation for conducting their Industrial Training Institutes, pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 920 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim direction 02-12-2015 in WPMP No. 46065 of 114 in WP No. 36804 of 2014 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHINTALAPUDI LAKSHMI KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2. GP FOR LABOUR (AP) 3. P RAMACHANDRAN 5 JS,J W.P.No.36804/2014 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioners. On the earlier occasion also i.e., on 16.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Orders”. The Composite High Court, on 02.12.2014, passed interim order directing the respondents 1 to 4 not to insist the petitioners to submit application for re-affiliation by paying the re-affiliation fees for the 2015-16 session. Hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.09.2025 KAS 6 JS,J W.P.No.36804/2014 583 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 36804/2014 Date: 23.09.2025 KAS