HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Second Application for Suspension of Sentence No. 501/2025 In S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1384/2024 Ramavtar S/o Jaganlal, Resident of Astroli, Police Station Sadar Gangapur City (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Sevar Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 27/10/2025 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was held guilty for the offence punishable under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal Act, 1995 by the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sawai Madhopur vide order dated 28.11.2022 and he was sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1000/- was imposed upon him, against which an appeal was preferred by him before the Additional Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur. However, the same was rejected vide judgment dated 15.06.2024 and the judgment passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sawai Madhopur was upheld. Against the judgment dated 15.06.2024, the petitioner has preferred the instant revision petition wherein his sentence was suspended by this Court vide order dated 22.08.2024 with the stipulation that he would appear (2 of 2) [CRLR-1384/2024] before this Court on 04.12.2024 or whenever he is called upon to do so. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner could not appear before this Court on the date fixed by this Court, therefore, under these circumstances, this Court vide order dated 06.10.2025 forfeited his bail bonds and summoned him through the arrest warrants. Counsel submits that pursuant to the aforesaid order, the concerned Police Station has now arrested the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner will appear before this Court as and when directed to do so and he further undertakes that the petitioner will not violate any of the terms and conditions of the order passed by this Court. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner be released from the custody. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Considering the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that pursuant to the order dated 06.10.2025, the petitioner has been arrested now and he has been produced before this Court today. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- subject to satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial). It is made clear that only on execution of the aforesaid personal bond, the petitioner shall be released on bail. With the aforesaid observations, the second application for suspension of sentence stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/42