Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48581 (AP)

UKKUTURI RAJU v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/12302/2025 · 2025-05-05

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12302 OF 2025 '■4% BETWEEN Ukkuturi Raju, aged about 47 years S/o. Ukkuturi Rajaiah, H.No.28-1572.Nunepalli, VijayabhanuStreet, RS Road, Nanclyal Nandyal District. 1. 2. Ukkuturi Rambabu, 48 years, S/o. Ukkuturi Rajaiah, H.No.28-1572, Nunepalli, VijayabhanuStreet, RS Road Nandyal, Nandyal District. 3. Ukkuturi vemaiah, aged 51 years, S/o. S/o.Ukkuturi Rajaiah, H.No.28-1572, Nunepalli, Vijayabhanu Street, RS Road, Nandyal, Nandyal District. Ukkuturi Govindarnma, W/o. S/o.Ukkuturi F^ajaiah, H.No.28-1572, Nunepalli, VijayabhanuStreet, RS Road, Nandyal, Nandyal District. 4. ...PETITIONERS AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Departmentof Home, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi. Guntur District, Amaravathi. 1. 2. The Superintendent of Police Nandyal, Nandyal District. The Deputy Superintendent of Police Nandyal, Nandyal District. 3. The Station House officer, Nandyal Ml Town PS, Nandyal District. 4. 5. The Inspector of Police, Nandyal III Town PS, Nandyal District. 6. The Sub-Inspector, Nandyal III Town PS, Nandyal District. 7. Ukkuturi Rajasekhar, aged about 54 years, S/o. Late Pitchaiah, H.No.28/1520, Labour quarters, Nandyal District. 8. Ukkuturi Govindaraju, aged 47 years, S/o. Late Pitchaiah, R/o. Gajulapalli Village, MahanandiMandal, Nandyal District. 9. Ukkuturi Venkateshwarlu, aged about 39 years S/o. Late Pitchaiah, H.No.8-17b-435, Society Colony, Giddaluru Prakasham District. RESPONDENTS I Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus may a) Declaring the actions of Respondent No. 4 to 6 in interfering with the pending civil dispute as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutiona l b) Direct the Respondents to refrain from coercing the Petitioners to settle the dispute extra judicially c) Direct the Respondents 4 to 6 not to call the petitioners to the Police Station without issuing notice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an interim direction restraining the Respondents No. 4 to 6 from interfering in the civil dispute between the Petitioners and the Respondents 7 to 9, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010243282025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY .THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12302/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Ukkuturi Raju AND ...RESPONDENT The State Of Ap Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA Counsel for the Respondent: 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION N0.123Q2 OF onon ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the at the behest of respondent Nos.7 to 9 respondent Nos.4 to 6 are disturbing the peace of the petitioner and that they are trying to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for the Home submits that the respondents 4 to 6 are not interfering in the civil disputes pending between the parties. 3. Considering the same, the respondent Nos.4 to 6 are hereby directed not to disturb the peace of the petitioners and also not to interfere with the civil unofficial respondents without following the due process of law. With these observations, the writ disputes pending between the petitioners and the petition is disposed off. No costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K J RAJA BABU ASSISTANy^EGISTRAR ^ICER //TRUE COPY// SE To, Department of Home State of Andhra 9 Buildings, Velagapudi. Guntur District 3 ThP npnnt'^Q Nandyal, Nandyal District. 4 Tht & ^ Superintendent of Police, Nandyal, Nandyal District 4. The Station House officer, Nandyal III Town PS, Nandyal St Sf 'nspector of Police, Nandyal III Town PS, Nandyamistrict 7 Onl Nandyal District. Q T Thathireddy Ashok Srivastava Advocate ropi in a 1:° CD Cop°: Andhfa''^a1lsra] , Amaravathi. RAM (gsg) HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER i\? ^ ^ ?l!?5 Current Section .4 ow m WP.No.12302 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS