Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48574 (PNJ)

BALWINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/4437/2025 · 2025-05-02

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4437-2025 DECIDED ON: 02.05.2025 BALWINDER KAUR .....PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Jastej Singh, Addl. AG Punjab SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under article 226/227 of the constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of a direction to Respondent No. 2 to protect the life and liberty of petitioner as well as her family members from the hands of respondent no.3 and some unknown persons who are threatening petitioner to compromise the matter with Arshdeep Singh and not depose against him in Ld. District Court who has murdered the son of petitioner and regarding that FIR- 257 Dated-11.10.2024 under Section 302 of IPC registered at Police Station Jandiala District Amritsar (Rural) (Annexure P-5) as statement of the husband is yet to be recorded before the trial court in case titled as 05.05.2025, SC-86-2025 and pending for are continuously threatening the petitioner and her family members to involve them in false cases under NDPS Act etc. in case if petitioner does not withdraw the Representation (Annexure P-6) which was given respondent no.2 by petitioner. MEENU 2025.05.02 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4437-2025 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be satisfied in case a direction be issued to respondent No.2 to look into the representation dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P-6) , within a time bound manner. In view of the above, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar (Rural) to look into the representation dated 04.04.2025 (Annexure P-6) and decide the same in accordance with law after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and by passing a speaking order within a period of two weeks. A copy of order so passed be supplied to the petitioner within one week thereafter. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 02.05.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.05.02 18:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document