Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48573 (RAJ)

RADHEYSHYAM GURJAR S/O HEERALAL GURJAR B/C GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLLA/61/2020 · 2025-10-27

Bhuwan Goyal

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Leave To Appeal No. 61/2020 Radheyshyam Gurjar S/o Heeralal Gurjar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Barana Ki Dhani Thali, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, Distt. Jaipur Raj. ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Sitaram Gurjar S/o Ramniwas, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Beenawala, Police Station Senthal, Distt. Dausa Raj. 3. Hansraj Gurjar S/o Ram Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Beenawala, Police Station Senthal, Distt. Dausa Raj. 4. Gajanand S/o Ramkaran, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Beenawala, Police Station Senthal, Distt. Dausa Raj. 5. Smt. Sumandevi W/o Late Veer Singh, R/o Beenawala, Police Station Senthal, Distt. Dausa Raj. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Addl.G.A. Mr. Manvendra Singh, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 27/10/2025 As per office report, appeal filed by the appellant is within time, therefore, no order is required to be passed on the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Hence, the application No.98/2020 stands disposed of. Matter comes up on an application (I.A. No.1/2025) for treating the present S.B. Criminal Leave to Appeal as S.B. Criminal Appeal. (2 of 2) [CRLLA-61/2020] For the reasons mentioned in the aforesaid application, the same is allowed. Office is directed to treat this S.B. Criminal Leave to Appeal as S.B. Criminal Appeal. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J Gourav/23