Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4857 (AP)

BRAHMMA REDDY DEVARAPALLI v. State SHO,

CRLP/580/2021 · 2025-07-27

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010038312021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Ar MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULYSq TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 580 OF 2021 Between: 1. Brahmma Reddy Devarapalli, S/o Narasa Reddy, Aged 65 years, Hindu, Cultivation, D.No. 2-10, Juvvigunta Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District. (A.1) 2. Kotamma Devarapalli, W/o Brahmma Reddy, aged 55 years, Hindu, cultivation, D.No.2-10, Juvvigunta village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District. (A.2) 3. Subba Reddy Devarapalli, s/o BrahmamMa Reddy, aged 32 years, Hindu, cultivation, D.No.2-10, Juvvigunta village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District. (A.3) ...Petitioner/Accused AND 1. State SHO, Marripudi Police Station, Prakasam Dist., Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, At Amaravathi, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh. 2. D Venkateswar Reddy, S/o Narasa Reddy Aged about 65 years, R/o Juvvigunta Village, Marripudi Mandal, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings Crime No.96/2020, datqd 29-10-2020 on the file of Marripudi Police station, Praksam District agiin.|t tfie Petitioners/Accused (A.1 to A.3). tA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Crime No.96/2020, dated 29-10-2020 on the file of Marripudi Police station, Praksam District against the Petitioners/Accused (A.1 to A.3) till the disposal of the Main Quash Petition. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. Pillix Law Firm, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri K. Mohan Rami Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the following ORDER: ] APHC010038312021 JN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 580/2021 Between: 1.BRAHMMA REDDY DEVARAPALLI, S/0 NARASA REDDY, AGED 65 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, D.NO. 2-10, JUWIGUNTA VILLAGE, MARRIPUDI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. (A.1) 2.KOTAMMA DEVARAPALLI,. W/0 BRAHMMA REDDY, AGED 55 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, D.NO.2-10, JUWIGUNTA VILLAGE, MARRIPUDI MANDA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. (A.2) 3.SUBBA REDDY DEVARAPALLI, , S/0 BRAHMAMMA REDDY, AGED 32 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, D.NO.2-10, JUWIGUNTA VILLAGE, MARRIPUDI MANDAL, PRAKAS.Wi DISTRICT. (A.3) ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.STATE SHO, MARRIPUDI POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM D!ST., REP. BY !TS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, H^GH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.D VENKATESWAR REDDY, S/0 NAR,ASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/0 JUWIGUNTA VILLAGE, MARRIPUDI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPOKDENT/CO?ifPLAINANT(S): Couns':! for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. Pi LUX LAW FIRM CounsDf for the Re ; pc nident/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. K MOHAN RAMI REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER: Tne instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proced;.! 1973 li iS been filed, by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 2 seeking to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.96 of 2020 on the file of Maripudi Police Station, Prakasam District registered for the offences under Sections 324, 341 and 447 read with 34 IPC. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that charge sheet is filed in the above crime. 2. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioners are at liberty to raise all their contentions before the trial Court in their defence and the learned trial Judge may consider the same and take appropriate decision over the matter in accordance with law. 4. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Station House Officer, Marripudi Police Station, Prakasam District. 2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi [OUT] 3. One CC to M/s. Pillix Law Firm, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. K Mohan Rami Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies sree HIGH COURT DATED:28/07/2025 ORDER CRLP NO. 580 OF 2021 r 0 1 SEP 2025 )g ^£se^ DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION