G.Vijaya Saradhi v. The Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments IV)
WP/31056/2010 · 2025-09-25
Challa Gunaranjan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48567 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48567 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 APHC010324942011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 770/2011 Between:
1. G.VIJAYA SARADHI, S/O.VENKATA RAJU CHARYULU TRUSTEE R/O.N.N.RAMANUJA KUTAM, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND
1. ANGALURI SRINIVASA CHARYULU
2 ORS, S/O.TIRUVENGALA CHARYULU TRUSTEE R/O.N.N.RAMANUJA KUTAN, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. ANGALURI SATAGOPA CHARYULU, S/O.TIRUVENGALA CHARYULU TRUSTEE R/O.N.N.RAMANUJA KUTAN, 49-4-5, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKAHAPTNAM. 3. SRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMYVARI DEVASTHANAM, REP BY ITS EXEUCTIVE OFFICER O/O.TEMPLE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orderssetaside the order passed in IA No.1965/2010 in OS No.144/2010 on the file of District Judge, Guntur dated 06.04.2011 in the circumstances of the IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 1437 OF 2011
2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit to protect the interest of Srivishnava Cult and to fulfill the last wishes of the original donor, it is just and necessary that permission may be granted to perform regular rituals like "Deparadhana" and Tadiyadhana etc and to provide shelter and good to the people who belongs "Sri Vishnava Community" and its was last wish and desire of the original donor IA NO: 4 OF 2011(CMAMP 27383 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant:
1. VINJAMURI RANGA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. 2. 3 APHC010507202010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 31056/2010 Between:
1. G.VIJAYA SARADHI, S/O.VENKATA RAJA CHARYULU TRUSTEE, NN RAMANUJA KUATAM, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE ENDOWMENTS IV, DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. ANGALURI SRINIVASA CHARYULU TRUSTEE, NN RAMUNUJA KUTAM, INDIAN, MALE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. ANGALURI SATAGOPA CHARYULU TRUSTEE, NN RAMUNUJA KUTAM, INDIAN, MALE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue Writ or order or proceedings more particularly one in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus' declaring the action of the 1st respondent authority impugned order dt. 27.09.10, Memo No.2562/EJV(I)/2010 is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and bad in law and consequently direct the 2nd respondent authority to perform all the regular rituals like Deeparadhana and Tadiyaradhana in the circumstances of the case and also direct the official respondents not to demolish the existing building bearing door No.1-548, NN Ramanuja Kutam,
4 Mangalagiri, Guntur District since more than 50 years from the petitioner's childhood and he was born and brought up in the said premises under the guise above impugned order and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 39512 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings of impugned order dt. 27.09.10 of the 1st respondent authority in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice as the said order is bad in law. IA NO: 2 OF 2010(WPMP 39513 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stop the 2nd respondent authority for construction of a commercial building by demolishing the existing building in the interest of justice and pass.
IA NO: 3 OF 2010(WPMP 42595 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd respondent authority to open the lock of the main gate to ingress and egress and to fulfill the last wishes and desires of the original Donor in the circumstances of case and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WVMP 513 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders granted in WPMP No. 39512 of 2010 in WP No. 31056 of 2010, dated 10.12.2010 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VINJAMURI RANGA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments,AP Region. 2. J PRABHAKAR
3. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
4. ELEVATED AS JUDGE
5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 770/2011 AND WRIT PETITION NO: 31056/2010 COMMON ORDER:
1. Heard Sri G. Vijaya Saradhi, and Sri Kappera Koteswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Endowments, A.P. Region, appearing for the 2nd respondent. 2. The petitioner in the writ petition as well as appellant in civil miscellaneous appeal is present in person. He has brought to the notice of this Court letters even dated 18.08.2025 addressed to the Registry, seeking permission to withdraw both the matters. Along with the said letters, he has also placed on record a copy of the order passed in O.S.No.144 of 2010, by which the suit was instituted by him against Institution was dismissed as not pressed. 3. In view of the request made as above, both the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal and Writ Petition stand dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
Date: 26.09.2025 NKA
6 607 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 770/2011 AND WRIT PETITION NO: 31056/2010
Date: 26.09.2025 NKA