[2025:RJ-JP:49468] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18633/2025 1. Bablu Kumar Saini S/o Shri Minda Ram Saini, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Vpo Baharawanda, Tehsil Baharawanda, Distt. Dausa (Rajasthan). 2. Jitendra Mahawar S/o Shri Mangi Lal Mahawar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Lalsot Road, Darwaja Mohalla, Dausa, Distt. Dausa (Raj.) 3. Kedar Chand Saini S/o Shri Kailash Chand Saini, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village And Post Bhandarej, Tehsil Bhandarej, Distt. Dausa (Raj.) 4. Jaina Ram Meena S/o Shri Ramkishan Meena, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Rudmal Ka Bas, Post Kalakho, Tehsil Bhandarej, Distt. Dausa (Raj.) 5. Bhajan Lal Meena S/o Shri Pheliram Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Reta, Tehsil Sikrai, Distt. Dausa (Raj.). 6. Vikram Singh Kasana S/o Shri Hardayal Kasana, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Jasota, Dausa, District Dausa (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Jaipur, Vidhyut Bhawan, Jan Path, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Secretary (Administration), Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited Jaipur (Rajasthan). 3. The Chief Personnel Officer, Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. The Chief Engineer, Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 5. The Superintending Engineer (P V S ), Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Jaipur Road, Dausa (Rajasthan). 6. The Executive Engineer (P V S ), Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Dausa, Distt. Dausa (Raj.) ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:49468] (2 of 3) [CW-18633/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that respondents Lordships may kindly pleased to call for the entire record of the case, examine the same and allow the writ petition by passing an appropriate writ, order or direction:- i) By issue appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to take further decision upon the order dated 18.09.2025 for re-opt the earlier cadre and the respondents be directed to cancel re-designation of the petitioners after allowing their applications for re-option in earlier cadre and the respondents be further directed to give the benefit of promotion/financial upgradation in favour of the petitioner as per the Regulations, 1975 will all consequential benefits; ii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents-Authority to consider and resolve her grievances. [2025:RJ-JP:49468] (3 of 3) [CW-18633/2025] 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /111