Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:87878-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12650 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shakuntala Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sumit Kumar Srivastava,Vibhu Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Shri Vibhu Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, after making brief submissions, concedes that there is no threat of the remaining land of the petitioner being taken away by the respondents but the only dispute is that there is no proper access to the remaining land of the petitioner and on account of which, the petitioner is unable to utilize his land to the fullest. He submits that the representation made by the petitioner in this regard before Project Director be directed to be considered. 2. Shri Ram Chandra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of NHAI states that the Project Director will consider the grievance of the petitioner, as contained in the representation dated 10th March, 2025. 3. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of by providing that the representation dated 10.03.2025 be considered by the Project Director in accordance with law. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 23.5.2025 Ankit. Digitally signed by :- ANKIT VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad