IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 1221 Madan Lal State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: None Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made regularize the servic daily wages from 01.03.1988 2. Le counter filed and reads thus: 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, by demonstrating that the 20.05.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-14892 Date of decision: Versus Punjab and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY None for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Prayer made in the present petition the services of the petitioner who was wor daily wages from 01.03.1988 in the jail. Learned State counsel refers to p filed and reads thus:- “That the contents of para No.7 of the writ petition (wrongly numbered as para No.6 in the writ petition) are wrong and hence the same are specifically denied. appointed merely on daily wage b fulfillment of all the requisite conditio services as mentioned in this para Furthermore this post of Cook ( jail department, because the food for the inmates is cooked by convicts nominated in the kitchen (langar section) of their own. Therefore, there is no question of regularisation of the services of the petitioner against this post permanently does not arise. further submitted that as per the kno respondent, even the case of Ranjit Singh has since been considered and thereafter rejected by the concerned dealing authority in compliance with the directions issued Court vide judgment dated 04.05.2009 in CWP as Ranjit Singh vs. State of Punjab and others. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, by demonstrating that the lis still survives. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 14892-2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 20.05.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. petition for directing the respondents to the petitioner who was working as Cook (Langri) on to para 7 of the reply to which no e contents of para No.7 of the writ petition (wrongly numbered as para No.6 in the writ petition) are wrong and hence cally denied. Since the petitioner was appointed merely on daily wage basis at DC rates, no question of fulfillment of all the requisite conditions for regularization of his ervices as mentioned in this para does not arise at all. this post of Cook (Langri) is not in existence in the jail department, because the food for the inmates is cooked by kitchen (langar section) of their own. question of regularisation of the services of the petitioner against this post permanently does not arise. I her submitted that as per the knowledge of the answering respondent, even the case of Ranjit Singh has since been considered and thereafter rejected by the concerned dealing authority in compliance with the directions issued by this Hon’ dated 04.05.2009 in CWP-6665-2009 tilted as Ranjit Singh vs. State of Punjab and others.” Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the respondents to king as Cook (Langri) on ara 7 of the reply to which no e contents of para No.7 of the writ petition (wrongly numbered as para No.6 in the writ petition) are wrong and hence er was rates, no question of of his arise at all. in existence in the jail department, because the food for the inmates is cooked by the kitchen (langar section) of their own. question of regularisation of the services of It is wledge of the answering respondent, even the case of Ranjit Singh has since been considered and thereafter rejected by the concerned dealing ’ble 2009 tilted Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, ASHOK KUMAR 2025.05.20 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document