IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 284 SHUBHDEEP STATE OF PUNJAB AND CORAM: Present: MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, 1. 2023 is for quashing of 506 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Division A, District Amritsar arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure P-2). 2. directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate 23.05.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. 3. Ist Class, Amritsar factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM- Date of decision: SHUBHDEEP SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Sahil Chaudhary, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Parminder Singh Kanwar, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the instant petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, is for quashing of FIR No.9, dated 08.01.2022, under Sections 336, 506 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Division A, District Amritsar (Annexure P-1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure Vide order dated 24.04.2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. Report has since been received from learned Amritsar, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -M-21473-2025 Date of decision: July 03, 2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Mr. Sahil Chaudhary, AAG, Punjab. , Advocate filed under Section 528 of BNSS, FIR No.9, dated 08.01.2022, under Sections 336, 506 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station 1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure .04.2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise ince been received from learned Judicial Magistrate , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and ...Petitioners ...Respondents filed under Section 528 of BNSS, FIR No.9, dated 08.01.2022, under Sections 336, 506 of IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station 1) and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 24.03.2025 (Annexure .04.2025 of this Court, the parties were on .2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise Judicial Magistrate , in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.03 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-21473 confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainant would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused 4. original, along with its report. 5. accused other than the petitioners and respondent No.2 is person in the FIR in question. 6. principles laid down by the Hon’ Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. 7. compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. July 03, 2025 Jaspreet Kaur 21473-2025 confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their will, and the complainant has also made statement to the effect that would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in original, along with its report. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondent No.2 is in the FIR in question. In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. July 03, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable -2- confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their also made statement to the effect that he would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in ed State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of , and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, , the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their he The trial Court has annexed the statements of the parties in ed State counsel too submits that there are no other the only aggrieved In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the Gian Singh Vs. State of , and also by the Full Bench of this Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, aforesaid Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of Jaspreet Kaur 2025.07.03 18:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh