Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48557 (AP)

R SATYANARAYANA RAJU v. CHAIRMAN & MD (E.P.D.C.AP) AND 2 OTHERS

WP/33539/2016 · 2025-10-16

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010206712016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 33539/2016 Between: 1. R SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O. LATE SRI UDAYA BHASKARA RAJU, HINDU, AGE 47 YEARS, OCC: ASST. ENGINEER IN APEPDCL, R/O. ARAKU VILLAGE AND MANDAL - 531 151, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHAIRMAN MD E P D C AP AND 2 OTHERS, LIMITED, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, P & T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 013. 2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER / HRD, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, P & T COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 013. 3. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION CIRCLE, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Divisional Engineer (ADE) on the ground of pendency of Criminal Case in CC.No.20 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory and consequently direct the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Divisional Engineer (ADE) without reference 2 to the pendency of the criminal case forthwith and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP 5066 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim orders passed 29.09.2016 in WPMP No. 41420 of 2016 in WP No. 33539 of 2016 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 41420 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents herein to consider the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Assistant Divisional Engineer (ADE) forthwith without reference to the criminal case in CC.No.20 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for SPE and ACB Cases, Vijayawada, pending disposal of the present Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A PRABHAKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) The court made the following ORDER:- When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is jointly represented by Sri N. Siva Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A. Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Abdul Matheen, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.Satish, learned Standing Counsel for A.P.E.P.D.C.L, that pursuant to the interim orders dated 29.09.2016 passed by this Court, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Divisional Engineer vide EOO (HRD) Rt.No.93 dated 24.06.2017/25.06.2017 in the respondent Corporation. 3 2. In that regard, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Corporation also placed a copy of the proceedings dated 15.10.2025 received from the Chief General Manager/HRD, Corporate Office, A.P.E.P.D.C.L., Visakhapatnam, which was acknowledged by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Considering the submissions made and as the grievance of the petitioner was already redressed, the writ petition is disposed of by making the above proceedings dated 15.10.2025 as part of the record. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 17.10.2025 GVK 4 107 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.33539 of 2016 Date: 17.10.2025 GVK