Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48547 (AP)

M/S GAYATRI CONSTRUCTIONS v. SRI SASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS

CC/2165/2024 · 2025-12-02

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010160892024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2165/2024 Between: 1. M/S GAYATRI CONSTRUCTIONS, ABHP COLONY, MIG 2- 15MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER A. KUMUDWATHI SEETHA ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI SAMSHER SINGH RAWATH IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH A.P. SECRETARIATE BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI 3. SRI P S RAGHAVAIH, COMMISSIONER, CADA VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. SRI VIJAYA LAKSHMI RAYAPATI, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DRAINAGE DIVISION GUDIVADA KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I AS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT 6. SRI SAI PRASAD I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND CAD DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT 7. SRI CH GOPINATH, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER DRAINAGE DIVISION GUDIVADA KRISHNA DISTRICT RR5 TO 7 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07 04 2025 VIDE I A NO 1 OF 2025 IN CC NO 2165 OF 2024 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed Respondent No. 5 to 7 in C.C.No.2165 of 2024 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V.N.P SAI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA 2. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE No. 2165 OF 2024 ORDER: This contempt case was filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 11.12.2023, passed by this Court in W.P.No.29593 of 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing in the morning session, learned counsel for the respondents represented that the Orders of this Court are complied with and requested time for furnishing written instructions regarding the compliance. For the sake of appearance and for instructions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter was passed over. Even though the matter is called in the afternoon session, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the orders dated 11.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.29593 of 2023 are complied with and also furnished written instructions dated 03.12.2025 to that effect. Hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 5. Recording the above said submission and in view of the written instructions dated 03.12.2025, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 03.12.2025 CVD