Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48546 (RAJ)

GUDDI W/O VIJENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8702/2025 · 2025-11-11

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45227] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8702/2025 1. Guddi W/o Vijendra, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Chandila, Police Station Naimandi Hindauncity, District Karauli. 2. Meera W/o Rajesh Kumar, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Chandila, Police Station Naimandi Hindauncity, District Karauli. ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Timan Singh For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Balveer Singh Beniwal HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 11/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 617/2024 registered at Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 332(c), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 125, 74 of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that vide an order dated 18.09.2025, interim protection from arrest was granted to the applicant subject to the condition that applicant joins the investigation. In compliance of the same, the applicant has duly joined the investigation. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the parties, considering that the accused-applicant has already joined the investigation, as directed, vide an interim order dated [2025:RJ-JP:45227] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8702/2025] 18.09.2025; that applicants are females, aged about 45 and 40 years; that there are cross FIRs filed in the present matter by both the parties; that both the parties have sustained injuries; that investigation carried out is distinguishing the present matter with other co-accused and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court deems it appropriate to make the order dated 18.09.2025 absolute and allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun District Karauli in FIR No. 617/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants Guddi W/o Vijendra & Meera W/o Rajesh Kumar shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/228