Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48546 (KAR)

SRI. N. SHIVA SHANKARA v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/7115/2025 · 2025-12-09

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52008 WP No. 7115 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 7115 OF 2025 (S-R) BETWEEN: SRI. N. SHIVA SHANKARA S/O. LATE NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RETD. DIG, IRLA NO.3532 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.110, HALERU VILLAGE, NANDAGUDI HOBLI & POST, HOSAKOTE TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT -562 122 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SRINIVASA K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 001 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF, CGO COMPLEX, BLOCK NO.1, LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 003 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CGO COMPLEX, BLOCK NO. 1, Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52008 WP No. 7115 of 2025 LODHI ROAD, NEW DELHI-110 003 4. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, CRPF, SOUTHERN SECTOR, JUBILEE HILLS, NEAR MLA/MPS COLONY, GAYATHRI HILLS, HYDERABAD-560 033 5. GAZETTED OFFICERS ENTITLEMENT CELL, CRPF, SECTOR-I, R. K. PURAM, NEW DELHI - 110 066 REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SHUBHA S., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DTD. 22.07.2024 AS PER ANNX-G TO WRIT PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PASS SUITABLE ORDERS FOR REPAYMENT OF THE DCRG AMOUNT OF RS. 7,32,578/- ALONG WITH INTEREST AT 12 PERCENT P.A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52008 WP No. 7115 of 2025 ORAL ORDER 1. After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging Annexure'H'. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK CT:KHV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4