Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48541 (RAJ)

SANJEEV SAHU S/O SHYAM SAHU v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6518/2025 · 2025-10-09

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41100] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6518/2025 1. Sanjeev Sahu S/o Shyam Sahu, R/o Plot No. 41, Moti Vi- har Colony, Ram Nagar,haribhau Upadhyay Nagar, Ajmer (Raj). 2. Shubham Maheshwari S/o Brijmohan Maheshwari, R/o 27-B, Chandra Nagar, Ramganj, Ajmer (Raj). ----Accused/Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Non-Petitioner 2. Badrinarayan Soni S/o Shri Lalchand Soni, R/o 1534, Sanwaliya Bhawan, Subhash Nagar, Khanpura Marg, Ajmer (Raj). ----Complainant/Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Garssa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP Mr. D.S. Dhariwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 09/10/2025 This criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioners for quashing the FIR No.193/2025 dated 10.06.2025 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Ajmer for the offence under Sections 420, 418, 419, 467, 468, 471, 474, 389 and 120-B of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted the compromise deed dated 18.09.2025 executed in between the parties for perusal of this Court. The compromise deed is taken on record. [2025:RJ-JP:41100] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6518/2025] Referring to the aforesaid compromise deed, learned counsel submits that the private dispute of civil nature has amicably been settled between the parties and prays for quashing of the FIR. The respondent no.2/complainant-Shri Badrinarayan Soni, present in person and identified by his learned counsel, acknowledging the contents of the compromise deed dated 18.09.2025, submits that in view of amicable settlement of dispute between the parties, he has no objection if the subject FIR is quashed. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced by learned counsels for the respective parties, the compromise deed dated 18.09.2025, statement of the complainant and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Others: (2012) 10 SCC 303, this Court deems it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The FIR No.193/2025 dated 10.06.2025 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant at Police Station Civil Lines, District Ajmer is quashed and set aside. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/66