Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48528 (AP)

State : Rep.by the Public Prosecutor v. Telugu Venkateswarlu

CRLA/1224/2009 · 2025-08-19

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

' f APHC010461972009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1224 OF 2009 Appeal under Section 378(3) & (1) of Cr.P.C against the Judgment, dated 19-07-2001 passed in S.C.No.123 of 2001 on the file of the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool District. Between: State: rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati. at ...Appellant AND Telugu Venkateswarlu, S/o.Pullanna, aged 45 years, Seetharampuram Village, Bethamcherla Mandal. ...Accused/Respondent Counsel for Appellant: Assistant Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent: Sri Lakshmikanth Reddy Desai The Court made the following: APHC010461972009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 1224/2009 Between: 1.STATE : REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. ...APPELLANT AND 1.TELUGU VENKATESWARLU, S/o.PULLANNA, SEETHARAMAPURAM VILLAGE, BETHAMCHERLA MANDAL. ...RESPONDENT Appeal under Section 372/374(2)/378(4) of Cr.P.C praying that the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Criminal Appeal against the Judgment in S.C.No. 123/2001 on the file of the PrI. Asst. Sessions Judge, Kurnool dated 19.07.2001 and prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to set aside the order of acquittal and convict the accused (respondent) for the offence with which he was charged. lA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLAMP 1335 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 2570 days in representing the above appeal presented against the Judgment in S.C.No. 123/2001 on the file of the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge,^ Kurnool. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 Counsel for the Respondent: 1.LAKSHMIKANTH REDDY DESAI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT 1. This Criminal Appeal is filed by the Appellant/State, challenging the judgment, dated 19.07.2001, whereby the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kurnool (for short, ‘the Sessions Judge’) acquitted the Respondent/Accused for the offence punishable under Section 354 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘IPC’). Heard learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing Appellant/State and learned counsel for the Respondent/Accused. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the Appellant/State submitted that the Sub- Inspector of Bethamcherla Police Station had communicated by letter, informing him of the death of Telugu Venkateswarlu, also known Chennammagari Venkateswarlu, who passed away on 21.01.2004. A copy of the Death Certificate has also been filed. A perusal of the Death Certificate shows the name of the deceased as Chennammagari Venkateswarlu. When the Registry noted this discrepancy, the Investigating Officer clarified that Telugu Venkateswarlu is also known as Chennammagari Venkateswarlu. The Investigating Officer ftfrther stated that he conducted an inquiry in Seetharamapuram Village and obtained confirmation from the Village Revenue Officer regarding the accused’s name. The Village Revenue Officer confirmed that Telugu Venkateswarlu and Chennammagari Venkateswarlu, are indeed the same individual. In support of this, the Sub-Inspector of Police also submitted the Village Revenue Officer’s certificate. 2. 3. as 4. Having considered the material on record and being satisfied with the clarification provided by the Investigating Officer, this Court is of the opinion 5. V. 3 I% that, since the accused has passed away, the appeal is liable to be dismissed as abated. Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed as abated. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this appeal, shall stand 6. closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool District. (With records) The Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Dhone, Kurnool District. The Station House Officer, Bethamcherla Police Station, Kurnool District. One CC to Sri Lakshmikanth Reddy Desai, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. BSV sree <v «- HIGH COURT DATED:20/08/2025 JUDGMENT CRLA NO. 1224 OF 2009 i or OCT 2525 ^ Current sseciion m r/ DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL APPEAL AS ABATED