Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48526 (RAJ)

CHANDRA SHEKHAR MEENA SON OF SHRI ROHITASH MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6124/2025 · 2025-11-14

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6124/2025 Chandra Shekhar Meena Son Of Shri Rohitash Meena, Aged About 31 Years, Resident Of Village Udawala, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Pawan Joshi Son of Shri Balram Joshi, Aged About 40 Years, Resident of Bidara, Police Station Shahpra, District Jaipur Rural. 3. Sonu Yogi Son of Shri Moti Ram Yogi, Aged About 25 Years, Resident of Bidara, Police Station Shahpra, District Jaipur Rural. 4. Maya Devi Wife of Shri Moti Ram Yogi, Aged About 48 Years, Resident of Bidara, Police Station Shahpra, District Jaipur Rural. 5. Chandra Shekhar Vyas Son of Shri Mahendra Kumar, Aged About 32 Years, Resident of Bidara, Police Station Shahpra, District Jaipur Rural. 6. Mahendra Kumar Vyas Son of Shri Sural Mal, Aged About 55 Years, Resident of Bidara, Police Station Shahpra, District Jaipur Rural. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prem Prakash Bunkar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 14/11/2025 1. By way of filing this criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 02.07.2025 passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Shahpura whereby the order has been passed under Section 164 of BNS and a receiver has been (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6124/2025] appointed for the subject land by initiating the proceedings under Section 164 of BNS. 2. In the considered opinion of this Court, the aforesaid order is revisable and the revision petition is maintainable before the Court of Sessions but without availing the aforesaid remedy, the petitioner has straightway approached this Court bypassing the jurisdiction of the revisional Court. 3. On this count alone, the present criminal misc. petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a revision petition against the impugned order before the Revisional Court. 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/32