APHC010187392022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11893/2022 Between: 1. HARIVARAM RAMANJANEYULU, S/O VISWESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC. REALTER, R/O. FLAT NO 201, VIJAYA TOWERS, 517TH LANE, ANNAPURNA NAGAR, GORANTLA, GUNTUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GUNTUR RANGE, GUNTUR. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VINUKONDA TOWN POLICE STATION, VINUKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. ASHOK KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VINUKONDA TOWN POLICE STATION, VINUKONDA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. KODURU RAMA KOTESWARA RAO, S/O AUDINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC MONEY LENDER, R/O DOOR NO 1-283, VEMAVARAM VILLAGE, PHIRANGIPURAM MANDAL, GUNTUR 2 DISTRICT. 7. POLU NAGAMALLESWARA RAO, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC MONEY LENDER, R/O. DOOR NO 2-65, DONDAPADU VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. SANTHIRAM PARAKANDLA, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC MONEY LENDER, R/O DOOR NO 6-89, KOPPURAVURU VILLAGE, PEDDA KAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. KOMMINENI CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC MONEY LENDER, R/O DOOR NO 3-139, DONDAPADU VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 10. P S N MURTHY, S/O KNOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC ADVOCATE, R/O. DOOR NO. 5-14-211, SABITHA RAJ APARTMENTS, RAILWAY COLONY, INDIRAPURI, WEST MARREDPALLY, SECUNDERABAD, TELANGANA 500026. 11. AANAM RADHA KRISHNA REDDY, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. MONEY LENDER, R/O. C/O. VALANKI FOODS, MADURA NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 12. HARENDRANADH CHOWDARY, S/O KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC. MONEY LENDER R/O. DONDAPADU VILLAGE, THULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 13. KOMATINENI SRIKANTH, S/O SIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC SOFTWARE ENGINEER, VELURU VILLAGE, CHILAKALURIPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 14. YAGANTI DURGA PRASADA RAO, S/O CHINNA NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. REAL ESTATE BUSINESS R/O. FLAT NO 301, YAGANTI PARKWOOD APARTMENTS, 12TH LANE, SRIRAM NAGAR, GORANTLA, GUNTUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 4 and 5 in involving in civil disputes and pressurized the petitioner and threatened him 3 with dire consequences and forcibly registered the Petitioner's residential house an extent of 125 square yards with assessment No 1021194860 in D No 13/2 of Ramachandrapuram Agraharam, Guntur town, Guntur District, in favour of the 6th respondent and threatening the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs 2,00,00,000/- (Two crores only) to the 6th to 13th respondents, without having any jurisdiction, by misusing 5th respondent's official power in the capacity of the 4th respondent is highly illegal, colourble exercise of power, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Article 19, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to conduct departmental enquiry against 5th respondent as per the G.0 Ms No. 288 / 2010 and initiate appropriate disciplinary action against the 5th respondent in the capacity of the 4th respondent for his indulgence in unlawful and illegal acts and pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents Nos. 4 and 5 not to harassing the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.2,00,00,000/- to the respondents No.6 to 13, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to conduct departmental enquiry against 5th respondent as per the G.0 Ms No. 288 / 2010 and initiate appropriate disciplinary action against the 5th respondent in the capacity of the 4th respondent for his indulgence in unlawful and illegal acts, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH VIDYASAGAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO 3. KRISHNA KISHORE BHATRAJU 4 4. V S SUDHAKAR 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11893 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 4 and 5 in involving in civil disputes and pressurized the Petitioner and threatened him with dire consequences and forcibly registered the Petitioner's residential house an extent of 125 square yards with assessment No. 1021194860 in D.No.13/2 of Ramachandrapuram Agraharam, Guntur Town, Guntur District, in favour of the 6th Respondent and threatening the Petitioner to pay an amount of Rs 2,00,00,000/- (Two crores only) to the 6th to 13th Respondents, without having any jurisdiction, by misusing 5th respondent's official power in the capacity of the 4th respondent is highly illegal, colourble exercise of power, violative of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 to conduct departmental enquiry against 5th respondent as per the G.O.Ms.No.288/2010 and initiate appropriate disciplinary action against the 5th Respondent in the capacity of the 4th Respondent for his indulgence in unlawful and illegal acts and pass such other order or orders..…= 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the Official Respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 6 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 19.11.2025. UPS 7 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.11893 of 2022 Dated.19.11.2025 UPS 87