Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48522 (CHH)

RAJESH KUMAR BHARDWAJ v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2906/2023 · 2025-11-05

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2906 of 2023 1 - Rajesh Kumar Bhardwaj S/o Late Shri Ramesh Kumar Bhardwaj Aged About 47 Years Working As Lecturer At Government Higher Secondary School Marool, Block Development Bagicha, District Jashpur (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.). 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Block-3, 1st Floor, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.). 4 - District Education Officer Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.). 5 - Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat Jashpur, District Jashpur (C.G.). RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/11/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records in relates to the case of the petitioner from the possession of respondents for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents authority to consider the case of the petitioner for payment of difference money and merged salary from merged date 01.11.2020 to till date. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly further be pleased to direct the respondents to give all the consequential benefits to the petitioner which he is entitled to get from the merged (सलय) date 01.11.2020 on the post of lecturer, in the School Education Department 3 10.4 That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners within the period of 4 weeks. 10.5 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief/relief's in favour of the petitioner, which the Hon'ble Court deemed fit & just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including awarding of the costs to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat