APHC010037952020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 2255/2020 Between: YARLAGADDA RAVI KIRAN, S/O PURNACHANDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 40-20-28/1, 1ST FLOOR, SRINIVASA NILAYAM, NEAR SCREW BRIDGE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TADEPALLE POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, , TASK FORCE POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, , VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, , GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. VALLEPALLI SEETHARAM MOHAN RAO, S/O. LAKSHMAN RAO, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC. FINANCE BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 9-349, 4TH LANE, RAJENDRANAGAR, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent No.1 & 2 in interfering with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondent No.7 relating to the partnership affairs of M/s Best Fortune and Company and forcing the petitioner to settle the claims of the respondent No.7 without following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal and violation of article 22 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 & 2 not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.7 relating to partnership affairs of M/s Best Fortune Ind Company in the interest of justice.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.7. 3. Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the Police not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.7. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.2255 of 2020 Dt.15.09.2025 Dinesh