Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48516 (KAR)

SMT LAKSHMAMMA @ HUCCHAMMA v. SRI P B JAYANNA

MFA/8074/2018 · 2025-04-22

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI & SRI. RAVI S. SAMPRATHI, MEMBER M.F.A.No. 8074/2018 (MV- D) (Lok Adalat No. 1899/2025) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA @ HUCCHAMMA, W/O LATE RAMADASA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS 2. SRI. RAVI S/O LATE RAMADASA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 3. SMT. NAGAMANI D/O LATE RAMADASA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 4. SRI. LAKSHMI @ KANTHA S/O LATE RAMADASA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENT OF MYSORE ROAD, THAGYAMMA EXTENSION CHANNARAYAPATNA TOWN AND TALUK 2 HASSAN DIST.573116. ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHETHAN B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. P.B. JAYANNA S/O BORRIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT PACHAKATTE VILLAGE HULIYURU HOBLI CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT-572214. 2. THE MANAGER SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. E-08, EPIP, RIICO INDUSTRIAK AREA, SITA PURA, JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN - 302022. REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. OPP. GOVT. BUS STAND 1ST FLOOR, B.H. ROAD TIPTUR, TUMKUR DIST.57221. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.C. SHIVANNE GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 10.02.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.128/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. 3 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: CONCILIATION ORDER The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellants - Claimants is present. The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present. 2. After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellants/claimants (being authorized by the appellants/claimants to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellants-claimants has agreed to receive and the respondent- Insurance Company has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.9,02,800/- (Rupees Nine Lakh Two Thousand Eight Hundred only), with 6% interest p.a. from the date of petition till the date of deposit, claimants are not entitled for the interest for the delay period, in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim. 3. The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of 4 award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit. 4. The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification. 5. This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER NM