Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48516 (ALL)

RAM PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/13006/2025 · 2025-05-05

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72203-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13006 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Priya Mishra,Shashank Shekhar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent authority in deciding the representation dated November 21, 2024 filed by him before the respondent. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising his grievance the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. Accordingly, the respondent No. 3 is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 Arun K. Singh [Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.] [Shekhar B. Saraf, J.] Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad