-1- W.P. No.9527 OF 2023 Date of order:25.11.2025 APHC010184482023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 9527/2023 Between: 1. B PAVAN KUMAR, S/O B. RAGHURAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC.SELF EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT 10-3, NAGAPATLA, AREPALLE RANGAMPETA, CHANDRAGIRI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOUREES(IRRIGATION)DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTEND ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATIDISTRICT. 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, SUB-DIVISION, CHANDRAGIRI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 5. THE TIRUPATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TUDA, REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 6. THE THASILDAR, , CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 7. DOLLERS VENTURE, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR, C. DIWAKAR REDDY, S/O C. MUTHYALA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, PURANDESWARI COMPLEX, NEAR SP OFFICE, PRAKASAM ROAD, -2- W.P. No.9527 OF 2023 Date of order:25.11.2025 TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to please to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2, 4 to 6 in not considering the Petitioner's Representations dt. 04.10.2021, 14.07.2022 and 18.07.2022 to protect the lands of Gangamma Temple (Village Godess) and Vagu a water body in Sy.No. 262 to an extent of Ac. 1.14 cents and in Sy.No. 263 to an extent of Ac. 0.76 cents totaling an extent of Ac. 1.84 cents situate in A Rangampet, Chandragiri Mandal, Tirupati District is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the Respondents to take appropriate action on the representations submitted by the petitioner dt. 04.10.2021, 14.07.2022 and 18.07.2022 to protect the lands of Gangamma Temple (Village Godess) and Vagu a water body in Sy.No. 262 to an extent of Ac. 1.14 cents and in Sy.No. 263 to an extent of Ac. 0.76 cents totaling an extent of Ac. 1.84 cents situate in A Rangampet, Chandragiri Mandal, Tirupati District and to pass such other order or orders… IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on the Petitioner's Representations dt. 04.10.2021, 14.07.2022 and 18.07.2022 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. O UDAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. KISHORE KUMAR.A 3. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV The Court made the following: -3- W.P. No.9527 OF 2023 Date of order:25.11.2025 THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.9527 OF 2023 ORDER: 1. The present writ petition is filed for the following relief: <…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No. 2, 4 to 6 in not considering the Petitioner's Representations dt.04.10.2021, 14.07.2022 and 18.07.2022 to protect the lands of Gangamma Temple (Village Goddess) and <Vagu= a water body in Sy.No.262 to an extent of Ac.1.14 cents and in Sy.No.263 to an extent of Ac.0.76 cents totaling an extent of Ac.1.84 cents situate in A Rangampet, Chandragiri Mandal, Tirupati District, is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice, consequently direct the Respondents to take appropriate action on the representations submitted by the petitioner dt.04.10.2021, 14.07.2022 and 18.07.2022 to protect the lands of Gangamma Temple (Village Goddess) and Vagu a water body in Sy.No.262 to an extent of Ac.1.14 cents and in Sy.No.263 to an extent of Ac.0.76 cents totaling an extent of Ac.1.84 cents situate in A Rangampet, Chandragiri Mandal, Tirupati District, and to pass such other order…= 2. On 27.04.2023, when the matter is coming up for admission, this Court passed the following order: <...the 3rd respondent shall consider and pass orders on the representation of the petitioner, dt.14.07.2022, within -4- W.P. No.9527 OF 2023 Date of order:25.11.2025 a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after due opportunity being given to the 7th respondent.= 3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for irrigation has furnished a copy of the written instructions, vide letter No.EE/ID/TPT/AB/803M, dt.18.11.2025, wherein it is stated that in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court, the 3rd respondent considered the representation of the petitioner, vide proceedings No.DB/T4/W.P.9527/2023/87 TPT, dt.13.03.2024 and the same was also served on the petitioner. 4. In view of the same, no further orders are required to be passed in this writ petition. However, the petitioner is at liberty to challenge the proceedings, dated 13.03.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent, if so aggrieved. 5. With the above, the writ petition is closed. No costs. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA BV