Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48501 (RAJ)

RAJ JATAV @ RAJ KUMAR JATAV (MINOR) S/O LATE SHRI JASWANT SINGH JATAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18687/2025 · 2025-12-03

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49156] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18687/2025 Raj Jatav @ Raj Kumar Jatav (Minor) S/o Late Shri Jaswant Singh Jatav, Aged About 16 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Darukuta Mohalla, Barlabas, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. Through Natural Gurdian And Mother Smt. Ramwati Jatav W/o Late Shri Jaswant Singh Jatav, Aged About 62 Years R/o Ward No. 11, Darukuta Mohalla, Barlabas, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Chief Engineer (Administration), Public Health Engineering Department, P.h.e.d. Head Office Campus, Jal Bhawan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Division Rajgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C.P. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 03/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “A. The impugned order dated 22.08.2025 (Annexre-11) be declared illegal and thereafter, it be ordered to quash and set aside and after that, it also be directed to Respondents Department to allow the compassionate appointment to Petitioner along with all consequential benefits. B. Cost of litigation may also be awarded to the petitioner. C. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and [2025:RJ-JP:49156] (2 of 2) [CW-18687/2025] circumstances of this case may kindly also be passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment of Division Bench in case of the State of Rajasthan Vs. Bhagwan Singh : D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 284 of 2020 arising out of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1806/2016 and order in case of Motilal Jingar Vs. State of Rajasthan : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2040/2018 submits that the controversy raised herein is squarely covered by the ratio laid down by this Hon’ble Court in aforementioned judgments. 3. Learned Government counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner may submit a representation and same shall be examined by the Department. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/250