Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48494 (AP)

Seshadri Bhaskar Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/26103/2025 · 2025-09-23

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010484272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 26103/2025 Between: Seshadri Bhaskar Rao, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: -2- W.P. No.26103 OF 2025 Date of order: 24.09.2025 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.26103 OF 2025 ORDER 1. This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of the respondents for non-payment of the contingent bills for the works undertaken by the petitioner. 2. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, and the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Corporation. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has executed the work, viz.,arrangements of snacks, food, tea and butter milk to polling staff in Α.Ε.-5 & Α.Ε. 6 Section Polling Stations and Flood Lights and Stand Fans in A.E.-5 Section Polling Stations under Guntur East Constituency-95 for General Elections- 2024 conducted on 13-05-2024, as entrusted by respondents 5 and 6. 4. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner duly executed all the works to the satisfaction of the respondents 5 and 6 and thereafter submitted a final bill for a sum of Rs.4,84,057/- and the same was approved by respondents 3, 5 and 6, but so far no payment has been made to the petitioner. -3- W.P. No.26103 OF 2025 Date of order: 24.09.2025 5. During the course of the hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 5 and 6 does not dispute the submissions made by the petitioner with respect to the completion of the work undertaken. 6. Considering the submissions, respondents 2 to 7 are hereby directed to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 8. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N BV