Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 06TH DAY OF JUNE 2025
BEFORE
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1702 OF 2022
BETWEEN
SRI VENKATAMUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS S/O LATE VENKATAPPA R/AT THAMBARLAHALLI VILLAGE T GOLLAHALLI POST BETHAMANGALA HOBLI KGF TALUK - 563122
...APPELLANT/S
(By Sri./Smt : H.C SHIVARAMU, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SRI RAMAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
2. SMT MALA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS W/O SRI RAMAPPA
BOTH ARE R/AT THAMBARLAHALLI VILLAGE …2
RSA NO.1702/2022 2 T GOLLAHALLI POST BETHAMANGALA HOBLI KGF TALUK - 563122
…RESPONDENT/S (By Sri./Smt : M.B.CHANDRA CHOODA, ADVOCATES FOR R1 AND R2)
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.08.2022 PASSED IN RA.NO. 45/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF) ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.01.2022 PASSED IN O.S.NO.550/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KGF.
This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:-
ORAL ORDER
In R.S.A.No.1702/2022
Inspite of office has raised objection regarding valuation and non-payment of DCF as per the certified copy of valuation slip of the original suit, the counsel has not complied with the office objections and also not made the payment of DCF and this matter is also listed for fourth time for non-compliance and the …3
RSA NO.1702/2022 3 counsel for the appellant also not diligent in complying the office objections. Though this second appeal is filed on 22.11.2022, on cost of Rs.1,000/- payable at registry, another one weeks is granted to comply with the office objections. If office objections are not complied and cost is not paid, this appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench. In case this appeal is dismissed, registry is directed to de-link this appeal from R.S.A.No.1694/2022.
In R.S.A.No.1694/2022 Question of consideration of I.A.No.1/2025 for early hearing before the admission does not arise. Hence, I.A.No.1/2025 is dismissed. List the matters for admission on 16.06.2025.
Sd/- JUDGE
NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 06.06.2025, office objections are not complied with, hence appeal shall stand dismissed. COPY
Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: SR R By: RG C By: GS Ty Date: 24.07.2025 C Date: 25.07.2025