Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48490 (RAJ)

VIJENDRA SINGH S/O SHRI JAMNARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13325/2025 · 2025-10-15

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13325/2025 Vijendra Singh S/o Shri Jamnaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Dholakheda Tehsil Udaypurwati District Jhunjhunu Raj. (At Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, Addl. GA-cum-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 15/10/2025 1. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by petitioner in connection with the FIR No.304/2015 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur (East) wherein he has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 420 & 406 IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that several criminal cases were registered against the petitioner in the intervening period from the year 2011 till 2015 with regard to chit fund scheme under Sections 420, 406 & 120-B IPC at several police stations, wherein the petitioner was arrested and tried and thereafter, he has been acquitted in all the cases. Learned counsel submits that the instant matter pertains to the year 2015, but the petitioner was not apprehended at the same. Learned counsel submits that now the petitioner has been arrested in the said matter. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13325/2025] been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore, indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioner. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender, therefore, he is not entitled to get indulgence of bail. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that in total 32 cases, all of similar nature registered, were against the petitioner in the intervening period from the year 2011 till 2015 and he has been acquitted from all the above cases and considering the fact that the incident pertains to the year 2015 and also looking to the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since the date of his arrest and trial will take its own time to conclude, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioner under Section 483 BNSS. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner-Vijendra Singh S/o Shri Jamnaram arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/218