249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4647-2023 Date of decision: 9th July, 2025 Simran ...Petitioner Versus Chandigarh Administration, U.T. and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Jain, Additional P.P. U.T., Chandigarh. Mr. Harleen Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 6. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- Learned counsel for respondents No. 4 to 6 submits that despite making several calls, he has not been able to establish contact with the said respondents. He wants to withdraw his power of attorney. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner as well. 3. It appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. Hence, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Since the main petition has been dismissed for non-prosecution, pending application if any is rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 9th July, 2025 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No Parveen Sharma 2025.07.10 11:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document