APHC010151292019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6517/2019 Between: 1. Y. NAGESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATA RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC AMT., R/O. OLD SINGARAYAKONDA, NARASIMHA NAGAR, SINGARAKONDA M.O., PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NAGARAMPALEM POLICE STATION, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3RI respondent in summoning the petitioner and detained him in the Police Station hours together and abusing him in filthy language and threatening him to implicate in false cases without there being any crime against the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3th respondent not to 2 summon the petitioner and detained him without there being any crime against the petitioner without following due process of law IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3 respondent not to summon and detain the petitioner without there being any crime against the petitioner without following due process of law, in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.6517 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: <….to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3RI respondent in summoning the petitioner and detained him in the Police Station hours together and abusing him in filthy language and threatening him to implicate in false cases without there being any crime against the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to summon the petitioner and detained him without there being any crime against the petitioner without following due process of law and pass…= 2. None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption 8for dismissal9. Earlier also, there was no representation for the petitioner. 3. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 12.11.2025 Pmk 4 44 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:6517 OF 2019 Date: 12.11.2025 Pmk