IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI^^^^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ PRESENT JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WPIT PFTiTiriM NO- 98 OF 2025 /V O O I y^, A ♦ [ HON’BLE SRI Between; Koya Subba Rao, S/o. Koya 802/14, 0pp. RTC Bus Stand, Piduguralla Pradesh Venkateswarlu, Aged about 56 years, R/o. Palnadu District, Andhra ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue , Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Palnadu 1. Department District. 2. The District Collector, Palnadu District Tahsildar, Piduguralla mandal Palnadu District Mandal Surveyor, Piduguralla mandal Palnadu District 3. The 4. The ...RESPONDENTS 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in Petition under Article the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the the action of respondent no. 3 and 4 be pleased to issue nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring in not considering and disposing of the petitioner F- line application Vide FS012202125371 dated. 29-08-2022 for conducting the boundaries of the petitioner land in sy.no. 127-1 application no survey and demarcate the of Piduguralla village and Mandal, Gurajala after the lapse of two years as illegal, violation of principles of natural justice. India and consequently direct respondent in an extent of Ac. 0.40 cents Division, Palnadu District even arbitrary, unconstitutional and article 300-A of constitution of no.-3 and 4 to consider the petitioner F-line application Vide application no f"^12202125371 dated. 29-08- 2022 and conduct survey and demarcate ?h<boi^ndaries in petitioner land in sy.no. 127-1 in an extent of Ac. 0.40 i' .. r t of Piduguralla village and Mandal, Gurajala Division Palnadu District. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent no. 3 and 4 to consider and dispose of the petitioner F line application Vide application no FS0122021^5371 dated: 29-08-2022 pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. ADITYA HARSHA VARDHAN representing PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI K. ARJUN CHOWDARY, AGP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010605772024 [3328] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 98/2025 Between: 1.KOYA SUBBA RAO, S/0. KOYA VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS. R/0. 802/14, OPP. RTC BUS STAND PIDUGURALLA, PALNADU DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT REVENUE VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, PALNADU DISTRICT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS \ 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT 3.THE TAHSILDAR, PIDUGURALLA MANUAL PALNADU DISTRICT 4.THE MANUAL SURVEYOR, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL PALNADU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri P, Aditya Harsha Vardhan, learned Counsel Pillix Law Firm and Sri K. Arjun Chowdary, learned Assistant Pleader for Revenue, Land Acquisition, Stamps & Registration representing M/s : Government 2. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner Endorsement has filed a Memo along with on 07.01.2025 issued by the Tahsildar admittedly, after filing of the dated 03.01.2025, Writ Petition. Having regard to the contents of the Endorsement, learned Counsel withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty bearing Rc.No.260/2024-A dated 03.01.2025. for the Writ Petitioner seeks to to challenge the present Endorsement 3. Request granted. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition i the Writ Petitioner to avail remedies to Costs. IS dismissed as withdrawn with liberty available to him under law. No Order, to as 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order. / Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI assistant I^ISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to M/s. Pillix Law Firm, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra 3. Three CD Copies. Pradesh. [OUT] ssb HIGH COURT DATED:09/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.98 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS