MOHD. ARMAN RAIN @ CHILLI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRMP/3227/2025 · 2025-10-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48477 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48477 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:52469
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 3227 of 2025 Mohd. Arman Rain @ Chilli S/o Late Moh. Imran Rain Aged About 33 Years R/o Sharda Para, Kishan Chowk Behind Amar Tailors Camp 2 Bhilai, Police Station Cantonment, District Durg (C.G.)
... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House O4cer, P.S. Chhawani, District- Durg (C.G.)
... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
Order on Board 28.10.2025
1. This is an o4ce reference.
2. This Court, vide order dated 12.07.2024 passed in MCRC No. 4877 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Mohd. Arman Rain @ Chilli, had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certi?ed copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment.
3. Earlier on two occasions also this Court had granted extension of KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN
2 time for compliance of the order dated 12.07.2024.
4. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Durg District-Durg (C.G.) vide her request letter dated 24.09.2025 has requested for grant of three months additional time for concluding the trial.
5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that the present case is presently ?xed for prosecution evidence. Between 15.07.2024 and 23.08.2025, evidence of a total of 10 prosecution witnesses have been recorded and the evidence of 2 prosecution witnesses are yet to be recorded. As some time is likely to be required for completing the prosecution evidence, hearing the ?nal arguments, and delivering the
judgment, it does not appear possible to dispose of the case within the prescribed time limit. Therefore, it is most humbly prayed that this Court may kindly grant at least three months time for concluding the trial.
6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is
directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today.
7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed o6 with the aforesaid direction.
8. Registry is directed to send a certi?ed copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Kunal