[2025:RJ-JP:48358] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18346/2025 1. Dr Sachin Kumar Sharma S/o Santosh Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Nayavas, Rajakheda, District, Dholpur (Raj.) 2. Dr. Saurabh Sharma S/o Dhaniram Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Secter No. 01, Shastri Nagar District Dholpur (Raj.) 328001 ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director (Public Health), Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. The Principal Medical And Health Family Welfare Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Dholpur (Raj.) 5. Block, Chief Medical Officer, Rajakheda District Dholpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Upadhyay For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. Mr. Archit Bohra accepts notice on behalf of respondent. 2. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Archit Bohra as counsel for respondents in the cause list. 3. Considered submissions of learned counsel for petitioner. 4. This writ petition is filed with following prayer: [2025:RJ-JP:48358] (2 of 3) [CW-18346/2025] “(i) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records related to the case and after examining the same be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order dated 31.10.2025 and respondent may restrain to replace the petitioners from another set of urgent temporary basis persons and not discontinue the services of petitioners till availability vacant posts of Medical Officer in the Respondent-Department and the respondents may further directed to extend the benefit of Rajasthan Contractual Hiring of Civil Posts Rules-2022 to the petitioners. (ii) Any other prejudicial order, if passed during the pendency of the appeal, the same may kindly be taken on record and after examining the same be quashed and set aside. (iii) Any other beneficial order or directions, which the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for respondent while placing reliance upon order dated 12.02.2025 in SB CWP No.2181/2025 titled as Dheeraj Kumar Meghvanshi Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that similar controversy is considered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and matter is disposed of in light of order dated 30.07.2024 in SB CWP No.12243/2024 titled as Shruti Moyal and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. 6. Having considered aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of in accordance with direction as contained in order dated 12.02.2025 in case of Dheeraj Kumar Meghvanshi [2025:RJ-JP:48358] (3 of 3) [CW-18346/2025] (supra) and order dated 30.07.2024 in case of Shruti Moyal and Ors. (supra). 7. Accordingly, the writ petition along with misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /124