Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48469 (KAR)

DR. PRAMEELA v. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

WP/11174/2024 · 2025-12-09

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51967 WP No. 11174 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 11174 OF 2024 (L-PG) BETWEEN: DR. PRAMEELA D/O K.JAVEREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 1391, 1ST CROSS, 3RD MAIN, VIJAYNAGAR II STAGE, MYSORE - 570 017. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUNEEL S.NARAYAN, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 01, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 01, REPRESENTED BY ITS JOINT SECRETARY 3. THE DIRECTOR MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT B M C R I, OLD BUILDING, 1ST FLOOR, BENGALURU - 560 004. 4. MYSORE MEDICAL COLLEGE AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MMC AND RI) (AN AUTONOMOUS INSTITUTE OF Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51967 WP No. 11174 of 2024 GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA ) IRWIN ROAD, MYSORE - 570 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR AND DEAN …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.P.YOGANNA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. SHUBHANKAR C., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRAKANTH R.GOULAY, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Suneel S.Narayan, counsel for the petitioner, Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and Sri.Shubhankar C., for Sri.Chandrakanth R.Goulay, counsel for respondent No.4 appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not pressing prayer No.1. When queried, counsel submits that a conscious decision is taken about not pressing prayer No.1. 3. The Submission about non-pressing of prayer No.1 is placed on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51967 WP No. 11174 of 2024 4. As far as prayer No.2 is concerned, the petitioners are contending that they have submitted a representation on 11.06.2021 vide Annexure E, 09.09.2022 Annexure- F, 24.11.2022 Annexure-G and 16.08.2023 Annexure-H and the same has not been considered as of today. 5. Taking note of the contention, this Court deems it proper to order mandamus. The mandamus is ordered. Respondent No.4 is directed to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners in accordance with law within four weeks from receipt of certified copy of this order, if not considered as of today. 6. Needless to state that the court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 7. Writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS