[2025:RJ-JP:36888] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13772/2025 1. Ghasilal Meena Son Of Late Shri Hajarilal, Aged About 70 Years, Resident Of Village Panchayat Dungarwada, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 2. Pyarelal Meena Son Of Late Shri Sunderlal Meena, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Village Panchayat Dungarwada, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer Department, Rajasthan Jaipur 2. District Collector (Supply), Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) 3. District Supply Officer, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Respondents Connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13749/2025 Rakesh Kumar S/o Nandan Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Garhi Kareelpur Tehsil Rajakheda, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supplies, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The District Collector, Dholpur (Civil Supplies), District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 3. The District Supply Officer, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13771/2025 Vijay Singh Rawat Son Of Shri Krishan Chand Rawat, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Village Panchayat Gopalpura, Tehsil Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:36888] (2 of 3) [CW-13772/2025] Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principle Secretary And Food Commissioner, Food Civil Supply And Consumer Affairs Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. District Collector (Supply), Kotputly-Behror (Raj.) 3. District Supply Officer, Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Gupta, Adv. Mr. Bharat Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav, Adv.for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 11/09/2025 1. The present petitions pertain to allotment of fair price shop. The competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorised by him. 2. Learned counsel Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav on behalf of Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy.G.C., has taken a preliminary objection that the matters primarily pertains to policy and there are different factual disputes which can be addressed before the competent authority. However, learned counsel is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioners herein can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due audience and considering the representation of the petitioners, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. [2025:RJ-JP:36888] (3 of 3) [CW-13772/2025] 3. In light of the submissions made by learned counsel, this Court deems it proper to dispose of these petitions with a direction that the petitioners or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector as per the recommendation of Hon’ble Mr. Justice D.P. Wadhwa Committee (more specifically in para-19 of the said report) on 24.09.2025 at and around 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shop qua the disputed site will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides. 5. These petitions are accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /6, 26, 30