Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
124 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-22082-2025 Date of decision: 29.04.2025 NASEER AHMED ….PETITIONER(S)
Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Satish Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Praveen Bhadu, AAG, Haryana. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J.(ORAL) After arguing at length, when the Court was inclined to dismiss the petition, learned counsel for the petitioner has sought withdrawal of the present petition at this stage with liberty to avail the efficacious remedy available to the petitioner in accordance with law.
2. Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
3. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 29.04.2025 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.05.03 11:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment