Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48456 (KAR)

SRI Y H JAYAKUMARA v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/20016/2022 · 2025-12-09

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52433 WP No. 20016 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.20016 OF 2022 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: SRI. Y.H.JAYAKUMARA S/O. LATE HULIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT YALAGUNDA VILLAGE SALAGAME HOBLI HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573219. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.S.ABHAY, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWNMENT 2 & 3 FLOOR MAHADESHWARA VARTHA BHAVAN VENKATARAO ROAD CHAMARAJAPET BENGALURU-560018. 2. THE TAHASILDAR AND MUJARAYI OFFICER Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52433 WP No. 20016 of 2022 HASSAN TALUK, TALUK OFFICE B.M.ROAD HASSAN HASSAN DISTRICT-573201. 3. SRI. NAGARAJ S/O EREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS YALAGUNDA VILLAGE SALAGAME HOBLI HASSAN TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT-573219. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 & R2; R3 - SERVED UNREPRESENTED) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO THIS PETITION BE ACCEPTED AND QUASHING THE SAID ORDER DTD.6.9.2022 ISSUED BY THE R-2 NO.D.V.S.42/2021- 22 VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52433 WP No. 20016 of 2022 ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing memorandum dated 06.09.2022 (Annexure-E) as to the transfer of Archaka from Shree Halladha Rameshwara Temple, Beekanahalli, Hassan Taluk. 2. In that view of the matter, as the said memorandum has been made pursuant to the registration of Crime No.74/2022 on the file of the Hassan Rural Police Station. 3. I am of the view that no interference is called for in this writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33