Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4215 of 2022 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.
1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press the revision. Sri Aniruddh Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is also not present even when the matter has been taken up in the revised list. Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State is present.
2. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist Smt. Aprajita Singh with the prayer to set-aside the impugned order dated 20.7.2022 passed by Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court No.1, Aligarh in Case No.1170 of 2021 (Smt. Aprajita Singh Vs. Vikash Kumar) and to enhance the awarded interim maintenance to Rs.15000/- per month.
3. The records show that previously on 22.7.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the revisionist to press the revision and following order was passed:-
"1. List revised.
2. No one appears on behalf of the revisionist to press this revision. Sri Devendra Nath Mishra, learned counsel for the State is present.
3. Sri Aniruddh Tiwari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 is also not present even in the revised list.
4. The records show that the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court in which mediation has succeeded and a settlement agreement dated 30.07.2023 has been drawn between the parties but since there is no Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Ravi Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Aniruddh Tiwari, G.A. Smt. Aprajita Singh .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
representation on behalf of the parties, the matter is adjourned as a last opportunity.
5. Let the matter be listed on 18.08.2025.
6. It is made clear that the matter will not be adjourned on the next date as a matter of right"
4. Today again there is no representation on behalf of the revisionist. The present matter has been filed for enhancement of interim maintenance awarded to the revisionist. It appears that the present matter has become infructuous by efflux of time.
5. The present revision is dismissed as infructuous.
September 22, 2025 Gaurav Kuls CRLR No. 4215 of 2022 2 (Samit Gopal,J.) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad