1 2025:CGHC:53183-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1219 of 2023 1. Sonilal Jaiswal S/o Late Shri Shyam Lal Jaiswal Aged About 67 Years R/o Village And Post- Bamnidih, P.S. And Tehsil - Bamnidih, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2. Shiv Jaiswal S/o Shri Sonilal Jaiswal Aged About 43 Years R/o Village And Post- Bamnidih, P.S. And Tehsil - Bamnidih, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3. Rahul Singhaniya @ Popo S/o Shri Anil Kumar Singhaniya Aged About 29 Years R/o Village And Post- Bamnidih, P.S. And Tehsil - Bamnidih, District : Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through, Station House Officer, Police Station - Bamnidih, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 2. Lakhan Dadsena S/o Shri Madhav Dadsena Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No. 11, Bamnidih, P.S. And Tehsil - Bamnidih, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 31.10.2025 1. The present CRMP has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- “It is, therefore, prayed that the Petition may kindly be allowed JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.10.31 18:02:42 +0530 2 and the FIR No. 54/2023 (Annexure P-1), registered at Police Station- Bamnidih, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.), U/s. Sections 307, 147, 148, 294, 506 (B) of the INDIAN PENAL CODE, may kindly be quashed (Only in respect to the petitioners), in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the charges have been framed against the petitioner by the trial Court concerned and the case is fixed for recording of evidence of the prosecution witnesses, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition at this stage, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take appropriate recourse to law. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Jyoti