APHC010244362016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25701/2016 Between: 1. GOLLAVILLI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O SUBBA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS OCC: UNEMPLOYEE R/O D.NO.18-11-30, 29TH WARD SAMALKOTA (MUNICIPAL TOWN) SAMALKOTA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. WOMEN, CHILDREN, DISABLED & SENIOR CITIZENS DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD-500022 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA 4. THE COMMISSIONER, DISABILITIES, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VIKALANGULA SANKSHEMA BHAVAN, NALGONDA X ROAD, MALAKPET, HYDERABAD - 500 036 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED WELFARE DEPARTMENT, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT KAKINADA ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V RAJASREE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV-CHILD WELFARE(AP) 2 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed seeking the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the first respondent in not including the petitioner's name in provisional list even though he was selected and placed in final list of selected candidates as arbitrary, unjust and violative of Article 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the Petitioner' candidature for Physically handicapped worker as per final list of selected candidates dated 26.03.2015 and issue appointment letter to the petitioner….” 2. On 25.09.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption „for dismissal‟. 3. Today also, despite the matter being listed under the caption „for dismissal‟, none appeared for the petitioner. From this, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 26.09.2025 Ivd 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.25701 of 2016 Date: 26.09.2025 Ivd