Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48453 (AP)

Katari Praveen, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14430/2019 · 2025-12-02

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010310942019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14430/2019 Between: 1. KATARI PRAVEEN,, S/O. MOHAN, AGED 35, R/O. DOOR NO. 2-182, GANGANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, (PAROLES AND HRC) REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS OF A P, OFFICE OF DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS, D.NO.24-28/ 1-8A, DURGAPURAM, GULABITHOTA, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. 4. SRI V LAKSHMI NARASAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, KADAPA, YSR DISTRICT. 5. SRI RAM CHANDRASHEKAR CHINTU, S/O SUBRAHMANYAM NAIDU, R/O. DOOR NO. 28-76/1, KANNAYYA NAIDU COLONY, GANGANAPALLI ROAD, CHITTOOR TOWN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. PRESENTLY IN CENTRAL PRISON, KADAPA, AS CONVICT PRISONER AND AS UNDER TRIAL PRISONER. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings No. 1639(P)/PAROLES and HRC/2019 dated 17-08-2019 issued by the 3rd respondent as illegal and contrary to law and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondent to initiate disciplinary and penal action against the 4th respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent and 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry in connection with proceedings dated 17-08-2019 issued by the 3rd / 4th respondent pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SAI SURYA TEJA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.14430 OF 2019 ORDER: Ms.Boppana Pooja Sree Chowdary, learned counsel representing Sri P.Sai Surya Teja, learned counsel for the writ petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 03.12.2025 Pmk 4 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:14430 OF 2019 Date: 03.12.2025 Pmk