[2025:RJ-JP:46138] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9779/2025 Akhlesh Kumar S/o Kailashchand, Aged About 38 Years, R/o 18/213, Gay Wala Chowk, Pakki Saray Aligarh, Police Station Sasni Gate, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, Presently Resident Of Flat No. 1202, Arther-2, Supertech Sizar, Greater Noida, Gauttam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7754/2025 Aniruddh Yadav @ Sunil Yadav @ Rajeev Yadav S/o Shri Omprakash, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 14 Duaagai, Tehsil Kole, District Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Beena Sharma with Mr. Rishi Kant Mr. Bhavna Jat for Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For State For Complainant : : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Nidhi Khandelwal with Mr. Bhagchand Bairwa, Ms. Tanuja Thakur HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/11/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No.226/2025 registered at [2025:RJ-JP:46138] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9779/2025] Police Station Kherli, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that the applicants have been behind bars ever since 16.05.2025. It is submitted that the matter at hand is primarily civil in nature and the same is triable by the Magistrate. It is further submitted that the co-accused, namely Suresh and Dayanand, have already been released on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed these bail applications and have submitted that there are as many as 7 to 10 criminal antecedents registered against the applicants. It is further submitted that the matter at hand has been investigated by SIT and a cartel was formed qua the applicants involving fraudulent documents and several transactions, with malafide intent, have been executed. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that there is strong record of criminal antecedents against the applicants; that the matter at hand has been investigated by SIT and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is not inclined to entertain these bail applications. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications are dismissed. 7. A copy of this order be placed in connected file. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /21-22