Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48451 (AP)

Kuppireddy Venkata Reddy v. Sri S.Dilli Rao IAS

CC/2643/2022 · 2025-12-02

D Ramesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010400062022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2643/2022 Between: 1. KUPPIREDDY VENKATA REDDY, S/O LATE KANTHA REDDY AGE- 47 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE R/O RANGAPURAM VILLAGE, REDDYGUDEM MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI S DILLI RAO IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DIST. 2. SRI SIDDHARTH JAIN IAS, DIRECTOR OF SURVEY AND SETTLEMENTS AND LAND RECORDS, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DIST. 3. MR K SURYA RAO, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DISTRICT SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DIST. 4. SMT Y V PRASANNA LAKSHMI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUVURU DIVISION, NTR DIST. 5. M PAUL, TAHSILDAR, REDDIGUDEM MANDAL, NTR DIST. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents for contempt of court for willfully violating the orders of the Hon'ble High Court passed in WP.23451/2020 DT-10-12-2020 and pass 2 HDR,J C.C.No.2643 of 2022 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M M M SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. P SUBASH The Court made the following: 3 HDR,J C.C.No.2643 of 2022 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2643 of 2022 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 10.12.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.23451 of 2020. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions, submits that the respondent authorities have conducted enquiry and issued endorsement dated 23.04.2021 to that effect and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 3. In view of the above, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Dt: 03.12.2025 sj 4 HDR,J C.C.No.2643 of 2022 168 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2643 of 2022 Dt: 03.12.2025 sj