[2025:RJ-JP:46698] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9443/2025 Chhoti Devi W/o Late Rampal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Mahuwa Kalan, Police Station Malakheda, District Alwar (Raj.). (Accused Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Gurvindra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 19/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.8/2025 registered at Police Station Thanaaji, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1), 238(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a female, aged about 44 years having no criminal antecedents. It is submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed. It is also submitted that no active role is attributed to the applicant in the incident, nor has any tangible evidence been effected upon her. It is further submitted that the main accused in this case is Subhash and the co-accused has already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. [2025:RJ-JP:46698] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9443/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the applicant and the main accused, Subhash, were in a close acquaintance/love affair, and that this relationship was the sole motive for the killing of the victim, Rampal. It is further submitted that the call detail records for the period from 22.07.2024 to 09.01.2025 reveal that 141 calls were exchanged between the applicant and the main accused, Subhash, however, these calls are not directly linked/connected to the present matter. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that the applicant and the main accused, Subhash, were in a close acquaintance/love affair, and that this relationship prima facie gives a strong motive to commit the offence; that the call detail records for the period from 22.07.2024 to 09.01.2025 reveal that 141 calls were exchanged between the applicant and the main accused, Subhash and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /23