Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:63706 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12601 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suryapal Singh Patel Mahavidyalaya Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vikrant Pandey,Vivek Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pratik Chandra Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has assailed the order dated 17.03.2025 passed by the respondent no.3- Examination Controller, Professor Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya) University Prayagraj debarring the petitioner's College from the even Semester Examination of Session 2023-24 for the next 3 years as Examination Centre. 3. Challenging the order impugned, learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that there is serious allegation against the petitioner that the petitioner's College was involved in mass- copying. It is contended that no opportunity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner before passing the impugned order. It is further contended that since the order impugned cast aspersions upon the petitioner's College, therefore, an opportunity of hearing ought to have been afforded to the petitioner. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents would contend that there is serious allegation of mass-copying against the petitioner's College, therefore, in such view of the fact, there is no illegality in the impugned order. 5. Be that as it may, the order impugned reveals that the petitioner was not afforded any opportunity of hearing by the respondent no.3 before passing the impugned order. The impugned order cast aspersions and serious allegation against the petitioner's College by alleging that the petitioner's College is involved in mass- copying. 6. In such view of the fact, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a detailed representation against the impugned order dated 17.03.2025 passed by respondent no.3 within a period of two weeks from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law after giving due notice and affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter. 7. The impugned order dated 17.03.2025 shall abide by the order passed by the respondent no.3 on the representation of the petitioner. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 NS Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad