Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 48437 (AP)

G SUMANTH REDDY v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/41356/2022 · 2025-09-25

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010699302022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41356/2022 Between: 1. G SUMANTH REDDY, S/O. LATE KRISHNA REDDY AGED 49 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, M/S.KRISHNA AGENCY, INDANE GAS DISTRIBUTOR, 24-426-C2, G.T.ROAD, OPP KASTHURIDEVI HIGH SCHOOL, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE, S.P.R.S.NELLORE DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, NEW DELHI. 2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, DOOR NO.7-20-13, KIRLAMPUDI LAYOUT, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing impugned notice Lr. No.G/SC/AP/06/1650 (G 20377) dated 07.12.2022 directing the petitioner to shift the LPG godown as illegal and arbitrary and set aside the same and further direct the 2nd respondent to amend the license No.Lr. No.G/SC/AP/06/1650 (G 20377) by incorporating the amended plan enclosed with the petitioners application dated 04.12.2022 and pass such 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to force the petitioner to shift the godown covered under the license No.Lr. No.G/SC/AP/06/1650 (G 20377) dated 07.12.2022 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMAKRISHNA AKURATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DIVYA DATLA(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 26.09.2025 before the Registry, inter alia stating that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition in order to pursue appropriate remedies with the respondent Corporation. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 26th September, 2025 cbn 4 253 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.41356 of 2022 26th September, 2025 cbn