1 2025:CGHC:55550 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12921 of 2025 1. Smt. Sukhmaniya Bai W/o Rampati Nagvanshi Aged About 65 Years Retired Waterman, R/o Village Pratappur Naka Khalpur, Tehsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 2. Shravan Kumar Singh S/o Rajaram Singh Aged About 70 Years Retired Time Keeper R/o Village Bodasarkhurd Pokhara, Jaunpur Uttara Pradesh 3. Lakhpati S/o Budho Aged About 70 Years Retired Chowkidar, R/o Village Pasta, Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4. Dohan Ram S/o Kangla Ram Aged About 70 Years Retired Chowkidar, R/o Baigapara, Ward No. 3, Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5. Umakant Mishra S/o Ramsajeevan Aged About 65 Years Retired Store Attendant, R/o Village Satpura, Tehsil Chakghat, District Reva Madhya Pradesh 6. Smt. Faridan Momin W/o Late Sahabuddin Aged About 75 Years R/o Ward No. 2, Patelpara Basantpur, Tehsil Wadrafnagar, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 7. Smt. Foolmati Bai W/o Ramlal Aged About 65 Years Retired Waterman, R/o Pratappur Road Kedarpur, Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resource Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. Engineer In Chief Water Resource Department Shivnath Bhawan, North Block, Sector-19, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 3. Chief Engineer Hasdev Ganga Kachhar, Water Resource Department Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.). 4. Executive Engineer Water Resource Division No. 2 Ramanujganj District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Keshwarwani, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Mr. Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 14/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been decided by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh [WPS No. 3870 of 2021 (decided on 30.09.2022)], therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in the same terms. 2. In view of the above, the instant writ petition also deserves to be disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 3. Accordingly, the writ petition (s) stands disposed of. 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Sd/- Sd/-Sd (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Raju RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Digitally signed by RAVVA SATYANARAYANA RAJU Date: 2025.11.17 12:52:31 +0530