SRI H A KRISHNA REDDY v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
WP/30241/2019 · 2025-10-27
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48412 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 48412 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42634 WP No. 30241 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.30241 OF 2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI H.A. KRISHNA REDDY S/O LATE ATTI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT NO.202/1, 29th MAIN, 2nd CROSS, BTM LAYOUT, 1st STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 068 (SENIOR CITIZEN BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NANJA REDDY P.N., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT CELL, CAUVERY BAHVAN, 2nd FLOOR, F BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 009.
2.
THE POLICE INSPECTOR DIRECTORATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS ENFORECEMTN CELL, CAUVERY BHAVANA, BENGALURU REGION, 2nd FLOOR, F BLOCK, BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI C. JAGADISH, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42634 WP No. 30241 of 2019
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER QUASHING FINAL POLICE NOTICE DATED 15.07.2019 (ANNEXURE-N) PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 2ND RESPONDNET AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND CONTRARY TO THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.NO.58211/2018 & 58212/2018 DATED 31.01.2019 AND THE KARNATAKA POLICE ACT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for quashing the Final Police Notice dated 15.07.2019 (Annexure-N) issued by respondent No.2.
3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, it is observed that the learned counsel has filed a memo stating that, the petitioner herein claims to be the owner
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42634 WP No. 30241 of 2019
of the land in question as per the registered Sale Deed dated 02.06.2014. It is further stated that this Court, vide
order dated 31.01.2019 in WP No.58211/2018 (Annexure- J) and WP No.58212/2018 dated 25.01.2019 (Annexure-K)
directed the respondents-authorities to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate
order.
4. Having taking note of the submissions made by
learned counsel appearing for the parties and in view of the fact that the impugned Final Police Notice (Annexure- N) had been issued with regard to the sale of the land in question, which matter has reached finality and disposed of in K.SC/ST Appeal No.168 and 171/2017-18, I am of the view that the impugned notice at Annexure-N is unsustainable and accordingly, requires to be quashed.
Accordingly, writ petition is allowed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE TMP/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39